Key mauled by chihuahua

Journalists are, no doubt, a crucial component in a functional democracy. There have been numerous examples of truly heroic exposes, such as Watergate or the work by Anna Politkovskaya.

But in a highly-transparent, safe and stable democracy such as New Zealand, frankly it’s hard sometimes not to find journalists a bit, well, underwhelming.

John Hartevelt evidently thought he had a scoop today, when he reported breathlessly that the Prime Minister went on radio and studiously obeyed election law by not talking politics, a mere two days after a soldier was killed in a war zone, and (god forbid) news continued to happen in the hour that Key was on air.

If Phil Goff had spent an hour on the radio without breaking the law, then I accept that that would be newsworthy, but Hartevelt must have been having a seriously slow day.

“It’s hard to recall when John Key looked this bad”, he enthuses. After acknowledging that it was really a perception issue, he then exclaims, “and this sounded awful.” He even found time to tweet about it, calling it an “Epic Fail”.

Perhaps it wasn’t such a good look, but as failures go it’s about as epic as a Hairy Maclary story with half the pages missing.

You would think a serious political journalist might be more interested in Labour’s persistent breaches of election rules than the Prime Minister’s strict observance of them.

This on the same day that Hartevelt (or perhaps his colleague) categorised a proposal to save $100 million by decriminalising marijuana as a shameless political stunt, on the basis that, although it wasn’t “a million miles away from ACT’s principles”, it was “a little wacky coming from the party that gave us three strikes”. This demonstrates a depth of understanding that could be plumbed with one of Uri Geller’s teaspoons. I should know better, but I still find this profoundly disappointing in someone employed to produce political analysis by a major media outlet.


2 comments on “Key mauled by chihuahua

  1. Adolf Fiinkensein says:

    Juvenile, puerile and pathetic.

    Journalists, that is!

  2. ZenTiger says:

    Journalists are, no doubt, a crucial component in a functional democracy

    Journalism might be a crucial component, but I’m not so sure about journalists, given that they call themselves that but fail to conduct anything remotely resembling journalism. They have been supplanted by bloggers because we can match opinion for opinion, and trivia for the trivial.

    You’d think with such a threat on the coattails of their profession, they might step up a bit? Then again, it might be as fair to blame the media in general for lack of investment into the research and investigation that underpins good journalism. Either way, the crucial component fails a large section of apathetic, disinterested, populistic, Coronation St watching, ignorant voters.

    Oops. Another problem with a crucial component in a functional democracy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s